>>32312
I hope I will not sound too defensive because you are not attacking me.

That was quite a long time ago. and considering quality I would not say it is that much worse than your pictures that involve blood and other gore so I assumed that it should be adequate quality for you
but you are right I spend way more time in researching new techniques than actually using them :) while you really do better pictures when they do not require something super-advanced.


It is not that simple to decide what to chose, because if you make very realistic debreasrting and other gore it looks pretty ugly and dull as just a surface heavily covered with blood and nothing more. check it here.
https://www.nairaland.com/1823960/bad-guys-cut-off-girls
so I was experimenting with that in various ways how to make it look best
>>9431 as you noticed is cartoon style debreasting with no realism at all character is also cartoon style as well.

>>14805 was actually the most primitive technique where I just added meat texture to the breast area and also added a displacement map to push it in. it looks good because it is very small.

>>15714 actually attempt to do a more realistic picture but I screwed it a bit because I forgot to change translucency layer so color went wrong.

You are actually first who told some opinion about those pictures so it is nice to hear it at least a few years later now LOL


If you want to try debreasting. just cut appropriate meat texture from some picture, add it onto the skin layer on both diffuse and translucency. that should look pretty good. just as good as photomanipulation.

you can go further and create normal maps with crazybump but that is a bit more advanced stuff which is probably not worth doing this way.