[Return]

Report a post

Preview
>>36590
>>36591
I mean, it's not like I'm the biggest fan of the system on lolicit. I very much prefer free access for everyone like on gurochan. But we can't really be picky these days, and it's just a fact that there are no other sites for this content. And gurochan has a lot of problems and nothing makes me believe it will get any better. I would prefer gurochan to be the site for every artist who makes stuff I like, but currently I can't really recommend it to anyone who isn't already here, instead I'm worried it might just go down again and not come back.

And of course I prefer Drabok over any artist on lolicit. Just like Zippy said, they are often skirting around the really interesting stuff, while Drabok actually shows it. But that's not just lolicit, that's everywhere - Drabok is the only artist on gurochan creating something I really care about, and before I discovered him I was here maybe once a month, at most. It completely depends on personal taste if you can still get something good out of lolicit. If bondage, rape and torture without serious injuries is good enough for you, then you will find plenty of material on lolicit, not just old material but also frequent updates by a bunch of artists. If you need serious injuries or snuff, you will find some material, but you shouldn't expect to get anything new very often.

And yes, there is some overlap between pixiv and lolicit. Pixiv has a bigger audience, while lolicit allows uncensored pics (some artists are getting away with that on pixiv, but certainly not all of them) and lolicit is a real community. I'm sure Drabok is getting much more views on pixiv than on gurochan, but this is the site where we are discussing, giving feedback and making suggestions, while on pixiv there aren't really that many comments. I think while most japanese artists are only on pixiv, almost every other 3D lolicon artist is also on lolicit, and there are probably more of them only on lolicit and not on pixiv than the other way around.
Post number No.36616
Board 3D CGI
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.