>>4703
I'm glad you wrote a scientific article about Chalk's works.Bravo! However this is just your point of view about lolis and what you consider to be sensitive material.Prabably in your part of the world this could be true but from where I'm standing I see it as complete and utter BS and a subversive way to scare uninitiated people from loli and shota content!

As for Chalk I believe he thinks to high of himself and throws leftover at us while keeping his good content behind the paywall!


>>4701
Right anyone who doesn't agree with you is one person.Any admin or mod could tell you how many of us don't like Chalk's new works but you keep thinking we're just one person:)