>>59909

> Drabok should still be happy because his art is getting seen by more people.
Really?
You indeed think that he benefits from a reposting by Anonymous without credit and/or source?
Sorry to say it, but this is ridiculous.

> The person who posted Drabok's art never claimed to be the person who posted the art.
I assume you mean "the person who created the art". Well, that's true. And yes, gurochan has no rule against posting other peoples work (https://guro.cx/rules/), which may be different on other sites. Although it is not a copyright infringment to repost Drabok's work ‒ as he explained >>59877 ‒ it still is a no-go to give no credit. I'm afraid ANON (>>59931) is right with the assessment that being polite is not very common in the internet.

> New could obviously just mean newly posted by the people who posted the art here.
Probably. OTOH it is weired to post each and every image with the subject and the comment "New". That's more or less an indication for the lack of own inspiration of this reposter. :>

The reposting itself isn't what I'm complaining about in the first place. It's about the way it is done: throwing only small chunks and leaving out essential parts.
But what bothers me most is the stubbornness of this reposter. Even without own ideas this person could react on objections.
Or is it you, Anonymous (>>59909), who's to blame? ;)