>>2134

That is a really nice comprehensive explanation. It really explaines a lot of the AI's behavior I've seen. Thank you :)

>Euler is like Euler A but supposedly better (although theory isn't practice). Unlike Euler it converges.

Sry, do you mean Euler A is supposed to be better or Euler?

>I thoroughly recommend that you lower preview quality and make it refresh every 2 steps or so, so you can visualize how denoising works.

Great Idea, I'll give that a try! :)

In general my problem with Euler and Euler A back when I first compared them a little, was that they both seemed to make most gens oversaturated and much less diversified (for lack of a better word), meaning they all looked too similar to each other for my taste. But now I wonder if using Euler/Euler A for HighResFix, Adetailer and some parts of the inpainting process can be beneficial. I'll have to experiment with that. :)

>2151

Uh, well the last iteration was made with pony, yes. ^^ But up to >>2126 it was done with SD1.5 (mostly with wondermix by zovya if I remember correctly.)

<=== here you can kind of see the evolution of that pic. on the left is the original drawing by Carl, the second image is the crudely photoshopped and colorized version that I started the inpainting process on. The third pic then was done after around 4 or 5 evenings using inpaint. Piece by piece without controlnet (which either wasn't a thing yet back then or I just wasn't aware of it, I don't remember. The last pic was then made last week with Pony (icatcher semirealistic), the debreasting Loras and controlnet (Softedge and/or canny) Again some details needed tweaking with inpaint but I didn't spent nearly as long on it than I spent on the third version in this image.

It's a shame really, to see so many real artists hate on AI instead of embracing it (Although there are at least a few). I mean, if a hack fraud like me can turn a sketch like that into something like >2127, then imagine what the guys with the real talents could do! :)