>>2156
"Euler A" stands for Euler Ancestral, Euler is supposed to be better because it converges better.

>was that they both seemed to make most gens oversaturated
That shouldn't have to do with the sampler, but if you're getting that, lower CFG
>much less diversified
This is basically russian roulette depending on your setup, loras and prompt.
For example, if I'm using a strong lora that dominates composition (for example a pose lora with small dataset), then Euler will stick to that, but because Karras feeds noise, it may translate as more varied, because it doesn't "plan ahead" as euler does.

Personally I stick with Euler A. If I get composition locked I either switch the size or rotate the sampler.