all
/
g
/
s
/
fur
/
art
/
ai
/
3dcg
/
f
/
rp
/
req
/
p2p
/
dis
/
lit
/
kaki
chat
GUROchan!
This list is WIP...
1
2
3
So use the classic menu
Link 4
Link 5
Link 6
Link 7
List 3
Link 8
Link 9
[
Settings
]
[
Home
] [
Catalog
] [
Search
] [
Thread list
] [
Stats
] [
Reports
] [
Watcher
] [
PMs
] [
Admin
]
Artificial Intelligence
[
Return
]
Report a post
Preview
EeL
2024/07/06
(Sat)
23:33:21
No.
2650
[
Report
]
▶
>>2637
Oh, I should have mentioned, that models/Loras/Controlnet-models and some other things are made with/for their respective base models and therefore not compatible to one another. So for example Loras trained on SD1.5 cannot be used in SD2.0, SDXL or Pony and vice versa etc. That's why Pony even has it's own filter category on civitai.
>>2640
Thank you, much appreciated! :)
>0.33 denoise?
yup, 0.33 iirc. Did you take a guess or do you have THAT good of an eye for that? :o I think I ticked 'mixed', but now that you mention it I'm not a hundred percent sure anymore. Is there something in the pic that leads you to believe I may not have had it ticked? :)
>looks cleaner especially on nipples
yes it does, but also I'm not even sure if I even used breast- or nipple- Adetailer, let alone inpainting on the nipples in the original pic, to be honest. Still, even I can see that the overall quality is improved, despite me usually beeing rather blind to this sort of thing. (So again many thanks for showing me the light! :D )
On a related note, by doing this pic I came to notice, that apparently Adetailer is working far worse in Forge in some cases for me. At least concerning hands. I tried for hours but no matter what I tried, the output never came even close to the results from a1111. (neither with the original settings used to create
>>2117
, nor with changed values, settings, prompts. I know I can relatively easily fix them with inpaint, so its just a convenience thing. But if you happen to know a way to fix it I'd love to hear it. :)
Post number
No.
2650
Board
Artificial Intelligence
Reason
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.
Style: