>>17475
Just as an example, even the video in the original post here, which I think is GREAT, to me it's obviously not real.

Does it have realistic lighting and flesh tones? Yes, but it's a sort of heightened reality, where it's more artistic, and there's a beauty to it that wouldn't be present in something "real".

Again, I'm not trying to be antagonistic. I'm just trying to see if we can establish a more defined standard of what "real" is, so we can more comfortably stay in those boundaries.

Does adding some level of "heightened fancifulness", keep it from being "real"?