>>21863
modest. you don't have to. I do. and I'm pretty sure it is.
whatever your reason for making these, most art of any kind is just silly experiments that other people like.
that video is awesome! just laughed my ass off.
but you're right, enough shenanigans in FleshReapers thread already!
you should create your own.

>>21821
mentioned that before, but talking about art:
You call this a test, but it is a flawless piece that is far better than a lot of the other stuff on GC.
While I would never leave a negative comment on any work, except constructive criticism if asked, there are huge differences.
This "danse macabre" could undoubtedly be used as cover art on a record, novel and so forth.

Sadly the blood, sweat, tears and other juices needed to create a piece of art are often enough not reflected in the result.
I could hammer at a rock for weeks, having something great in mind and it would still be a rock. A great part of art lies within the
creative vision. The rest is finding the right technique to bring it to life. I'm rather sure if the "old masters" had AI at their disposal,
they would've used it. And if it were that easy creating something great using AI, all AI works would be fantastic. They are not. Most are garbage.
So yes, the images that I was talking about here, are most definitely art in my book.