>>27723
No moralfaggotry intended, but photorealistic minors are always a liability. It's considered CSAM in most jurisdictions, and good luck convincing a jury of boomers when it looks nearly indistinguishable from the real thing.

It would be one thing if they were clothed and there were no sex acts, you might be able to pass it off as extreme horror content. But the line between between sodomizing a severed head and jerking off on one isn't very thick.

Despite there being no victims, it could easily get anyone who has it on their device into hot, HOT water, even though they've never hurt anyone and have no intention to do so.