>>29242
No, this is neither racism nor “Islamophobia.” This is a narrative taken directly from the most authoritative Islamic sources.
The Banu Qurayza episode is reported in:

The Sirat Rasul Allah of Ibn Ishaq / Ibn Hisham (the primary biography of the Prophet)
Sahih al-Bukhari
Sahih Muslim
Sunan Abu Dawud 4404 (the hadith of Atiyyah al-Qurazi about the examination of pubic hair)
The History of al-Tabari

According to these texts:

After the Battle of the Trench, the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza was accused of treason.
Sa’d ibn Mu’adh issued the judgment: the men and pubescent boys were to be executed, while the women and children were taken captive.
The criterion used for the adolescent boys was explicitly the presence of pubic hair (Sunan Abu Dawud 4404).
The sources describe several hundred men being beheaded in trenches in Medina.

This is not some “far-right invention.” It is an event that classical Muslim sources themselves narrate, often justifying it as the punishment for treason in wartime.
Saying “you could have made them Christian pirates” misses the point entirely. The purpose of the video is precisely to show an episode drawn from Islam’s own foundational texts, not a generic story about bandits. Criticizing a religion is not done by inventing actions, but by citing what its own sources report.
If you believe these texts are lying, or that Ibn Ishaq, Bukhari, Muslim and Abu Dawud fabricated the story, then the debate is about the reliability of the Islamic sources themselves. But calling a narrative found in the Sira and the canonical hadith collections a “racist lie” is simply refusing to look at the texts.