[Return] [Bottom]

Posting mode: Reply

BBCode
(for deletion)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, webp, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 25000 KB.
  • Images greater than 255 * 255 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • 148 unique users in the last 30 minutes (including lurkers)




    First
    [1]
    Last

    https://files.catbox.moe/nxkui9.mp4

    or

    https://file.garden/aecQ3YtN8glaOMdJ/frame-crux.mp4

    I'm happy to have finally done the full concept I had for this video, after having set the project aside for a while... but the quality is very meh.

    Further, Wan 2.7 clearly has a limited understanding of how chainsaws operate and where cuts happen relative to where the blade of the chainsaw is placed. I've seen some chainsaw confusion in the Grok videos too, but at least they generally have much higher video quality than I ended up with.

    It's possible if I did this over again at 1080p instead of 720p I wouldn't get so much generational loss from using the last frame of one 15-second segment as the starter frame for the next. The main thing that stopped me from using 1080p is that I was being cheap, knowing (as turned out to be true) I'd end up generating a few dozens video clips just to get the final four clips that were on-target enough to be usable.

    If anyone has any hints that would help make Wan 2.7 either smarter about chainsaws, or better with video quality when stringing multiple segments together, I'd love to get some pointers.
    >>
    love it carry on being 'cheap'

    [Top]

    Delete post: []
    First
    [1]
    Last