>>13789
>Also, could it be possible having her looking at viewer in a quick edit on the finished drawing?
I am afraid this cannot be the case because she's not talking with the viewer. I could not bear the sense of inconsistency if she was looking at me instead of his (poor) interlocutor. But don't worry for that sequence is not finished yet. In the third picture she will have quite of a mouthful to handle, so she won't speak and she will bless us with her glare again :D

>>14188
>>14189
Aaah, now that's something I can work on! I will need some time to find a decent way to represent all of these things but, at least, I know what have to be represented! By the way, the word "decent" sounds mostly like a gag in such a statement, doesn't it? :P

>>14197
I use to say "to each one their own" and surely I am not in the position to call anybody a weirdo but your thing sounds very... uncommon! But it's still in my range and it tickles me! The only problem I have with (drawn) bestiality is that I can't draw animals very well but... I will find something out. Just be patient.

>>14199
And also more illustrators like that! I am a little tired to do all the dirty job by myself! XD