>>17259
What the hell are you doing? Are you mixing compliments and insults? Surely I have my share of stupidity but I also know what I'm talking about! You deserve a proper reply...
LOL! Don't worry, I am not really angry and I am just going to offer you a different perspective. On the mere "technical side", my skills are more or less "stable" since about ten years. The rest depends on the time that I can spend drawing and lately it's not that much, sigh! However, people will like a sketch more than a drawing if the sketch meets their tastes while the drawing doesn't. And this is twice true if we're talking about fetishes. I've seen it happen dozen times here on Gurochan, lol! So, in my opinion the real question is -"Am I actually improved or have I become just more responsive to people's requests"?

>>17265
I've enjoyed this comment very much because the thing of which you're giving me the credit it's mostly an unintentional achievement. Let me explain, so I won't look like a false modest again, lol. I always try to balance the elements in a drawing without focusing on something specific. I mean, the subject may be something very peculiar but any part of the drawing must be as good as the others. If different people with different tastes are tingled by different details in the same drawing, it may mean that the above mentioned balancing has been achieved. That's why I am very glad about your comment. It shows me that I am on the right track. Thanks!



>>16715, >>16738, >>16848
As you can see, I've also started working on your idea.