>>19406
"> I am glutton for criticism...
" Well, I think that you've passed the point from which the average audience can't tell you anything without stumbling on matters of mere personal taste. As for me, I keep in high regard all those artists who look so at ease with inking because that's a dreadful operation to me. I especially like how your strokes have a nervous aspect while remaining perfectly functional and good looking. I think it's a very cool thing. However, if you really want me to split the hair, there's an advice which I can give to you. Generally speaking, when drawing overlapping figures, things can turn out quite mixed up. This problem can be solved by coloring, by shading, by giving the proper amount of details to each layer and by inking the foreground figures thicker. Now, I can see that you prefer to ink because most of your drawings are made of outlines, so let's drop colors and shades. I can also see that you are aware of the problem of which we are talking about and that your favourite method to solve it is to give the proper amount of details to each layer. That's ok but this method has its limits (see >>19543 and >>19198 for example). I suggest you to focus on inking the foreground figures thicker. Again, I am splitting the hair.
And now, I will end this so unnecessarily long post by praising you for your... how to say... honesty! Look at >>19572, in example. There's a main panel showing a large execution and ten smaller ones showing a close-up of each victim (with lovely boobs). A lazy ass like me would have drawn a scaled version of the faces in the main panel to avoid sketching again, but I can tell by the slightly different poses that you've redrawn all of them. And this is very cool! You surely deserve more love from your audience (if not more money).