Wow, that's pretty good.
I love how detailed are your pictures and your content is also quite creative.

It reminds me of someone who was posting something similar on lolicit maybe it is you?

sexy work

Excellent art!!!
The drawing with the girl stretched on the rack is awesome!!
I would like a lot to see more works from you…!

Great art!!! I like it a lot!
Can you post some more, please?
Thank you!!

More please!!!

lovely stuff

This is really good work.
Very hot and I'd love to see more of it!
Thanks for sharing!

Who wants more straight from the Author?

This looks great indeed!

t looks to be the same hand

It's good to see this guy's drawings here. He used to post on lolicit before lolicit disappeared.

If the person posting here is the artist himself, thank you for your work. Wonderfully erotic stuff.

This artist’s style reminds me strongly of an artist I discovered (don’t remember how) about 20 years ago, except he absolutely didn’t do boys, and I doubt those two are his. The site was called “drawfree” but there’s no point in searching for that now, he’s apparently been erased from the internet because of his themes. I might have saved some of his work and be able to find it, but it would be a hassle if it’s even possible, so no promises. He did minimalist black-and-white drawings with only the essential details to get the point across. He included some things that would be right at home here on gurochan, like impalement, mutilation, and cooking, but I know I didn’t save any of those.

>>47292
>It's good to see this guy's drawings here. He used to post on lolicit before lolicit disappeared.

>If the person posting here is the artist himself, thank you for your work. Wonderfully erotic stuff.

The artist's nickname is Larry.
He definitely knows how to inflict pain with the tip of a pencil.

He’s alive and even watches Gurochan, as far as I know, and we even talk sometimes in secure enough place.
So you can applaud him there; I'm sure he would be flattered.

Those images were reposted there long ago without his consent, but what's done - is done. He recently said he'd be happy if someone could breathe new life into his drawings with AI. Just (my kind ask) don't forget to mention the original artist.

>>47305
> He recently said he'd be happy if someone could breathe new life into his drawings with AI.

I had played around with that idea before. I just updated a photorealistic version I'd made a while back, and then converted the update into an alternate safe-to-post-directly-here anime style version.

Photorealistic version: https://file.garden/aecQ3YtN8glaOMdJ/gc-posts/larry-saboteur-01.png

>>47293

I found what I’d saved from what is likely a different artist with a very similar style.

I hesitate to put them here for three main reasons: I edited several of them and don’t know how the artist would feel about someone releasing the edited versions, and it’s unclear whether he’d want his art put here at all, and if there are two artists involved I’d be hijacking the thread. Comments?

>>47309
> I found what I’d saved from what is likely a different artist with a very similar style.

It would at least be reasonable to post one or two of these other images, just for comparing style.

As for a bunch of tnese other images... harder to say.

Everything here so far looks like Larry's work, but the title of the thread is simply "bondage torture", not "Larry's bondage torture", so it's not like we have a sacred duty to keep this an all-Larry thread.

As for what this other artist would think of you making alterations... hard to say, but as long as you make it clear where you've made changes, should be OK.

Alright, given the “bondage torture” title, it doesn’t have to be the same artist, and for all I can tell, it might be anyway. Almost all of these are bondage, though some aren’t, many are torture, though some aren’t, most are unaltered, though a few are, and I’m going to assume the artist won’t mind that someone who saved them will post them, considering they’ve been wiped off the internet everywhere else.

Starting off with a series of five featuring “Carol” and if anyone wants to animate them, I’d love to see it. Guesses whether this might be the same artist?

Another series of five. It seems that I erased the number in a circle on 1, 2, 3, and 5 in the Carol series, sorry.

>>47322
> it doesn’t have to be the same artist, and for all I can tell, it might be anyway

Definitely a different guy, but fits the theme here just fine.

The system renamed them, I’m not going to try to figure out the original names. The spiked rod in this looks very similar to ones above. Could style differences be due to decades?

>>47333
> Could style differences be due to decades?

Not likely. The way shading is done, the brutish looking adult characters, the rape-iness (if that's a word)... very different from the Larry style I know.

This is yet another artist from long long ago. Don't worry, I only have two, because he quickly realized his artwork sucked and he was better at writing stories.

Besides, it’s a lot safer to write stories than to keep drawings around where anyone could find them.

Stupid software wasted two days of my time trying to get these here. Finally, something gurochan might not yawn about.

The other girls watch from the cage. Interesting device.

I altered this one, erasing the girl on a spit roasting in the background. I was never expecting to pass it on. My second complaint, that I didn’t erase: why would it have padding on it? To make her comfortable? You’re kidding! And there really needed to be more in this series.

Again with the padding? I’d make it spiked.

This is the one I altered the most for the version I kept. I cropped out and erased the rest of a fourth girl to the right that had the rod coming out her mouth. That’s too much for my tastes. Note this one has no man in it.

>>47359
>>47358
>>27979
Nice