>>6211
>>Your argument breaks down as soon as you put "self-proclaimed experts" into >>6201's mouth.


I don't put anything whast was not already there
>>"Being able to make choices that affect everyone isn't a right, it's a responsibility. The average person has proven time and again they aren't ready for that responsibility so it should be ceded to experts."

>>6231
>>Mind elaborating the specifications on fascism? Becuase it seems the word means a tyannical government mandating how people act.


It is not the tyrannical government because you can disagree with the tyrant and still be respectable citizen merely if you do not challenge him. You are not required to agree with tyrant you merely have to obey him because he is stronger than you or for other reasons.

Under fascism and socialism that is not enough, you actually have to believe in state ideology and you will be prosecuted not for disobedience but for being different.

here is an example from Slavoi Zizek lecture:
Your father wants you to visit grandmother:
tyrannical version:
Tomorrow you have to visit your grandmother tomorrow and no excuses. you have to be there at 15:00

faschist/socialist version:

Your grandmother loves you so much and she wants to see you tomorrow, please visit her if you really love her.


Or another example boss and employee

tyrany:
This job has to be done tomorrow. if not you are fired.

faschism:
Our company reputation is at stake if this is not done tomorrow we may go bankrupt.