>>6380
you have a point, maybe there is a connection between some one that get hurt, and the arousal.

i see an erotic side to the suffer, and its way better expressed in 'porn' content rather than 'real life' content, but fair enough, i might get aroused if i see my fetish somewhere in 'real life', and if i think some1 actually got hurt, there is still two sides to this.

and it also strengthens my argument, i mean, if you have to witness suffer in order to be aroused, what does it say about you?

and also, some distance must be kept from reallity in order for the thing to be arousing, that probably differ from one individual to another, lets take the decapitation for example, i dont know if some one who likes decapitation, will get aroused at all by really decapitate some1, or even being present to this in real life.

if this assumtion is right, there is clear seperation between real life and fantasy, and the line is between arousing to overwhelming will be determine individually, which raise the next question- at what point is this becoming wrong?