>>6692
Depends on your definition of education, If the meaning of education is regurgitating some dogmas and obviously illogical stuff I am not educated. I prefer to think a bit more in-depth.

Any kind of response requires certain logic behind it which must be based on objective factors. Until there this is not explained I declare entire theory as bullshit.
If you want to prove that instinct to survive does exist you have to explain how it works. Until you cant do that it does not exist.
I do not see any evidence that such thing could exist because like I said before, there is no definition of survival.

The desire to live is more related to the unwillingness to lose your investments, and it is proportional to the amount of what you have. The more potential you have the more you value your life when you have nothing you usually do not care about dying. I can also apply this to myself because when I was a child I couldn't care less about dying but now I have too much to lose.
on the other hand, uneducated gangsters do not value their life at all and they die young. Same is valid for ancient warriors who had little regrets about dying in the battle. and instinct of survival did not bother them at all, even now it is not uncommon when combatants of third-world states run into the battle like movie heroes without the slightest concern about safety. Rich people newer behave like that. When you are rich you will do anything to stay alive. Even terrorists, when they actually achieve something in life, become very unwilling to die.