>>7622

>a big chunk of that history about those deaths is a lie


I think you'll have to back that up before I believe it.

>but this is irrelevant because the soviet union was not the communist state, because labeling soviet union comiu8nist just because it was ruled by communist party


You're splitting hairs - sure, you could say that they had not achieved true communism, but by that metric nobody has, and nobody will. The totalitarianism that is imposed to bring communism into being is that theory's own "fatal problem" in that nobody running the totalitarian state will ever come around to the point where they hand the power over to the people like they're supposed to.

>slavery and feudalism went under so why capitalism is eternal?


For one thing, slavery and feudalism are not even the same kind of concepts as capitalism.

I wouldn't say capitalism is eternal, but there has to be a lot more in place before it disappears. Capitalism exists wherever two or more people exchange their work or their property for other forms of work and property (or currency as symbols of the same). Until you convince everyone on earth that nobody actually has a right to own or trade anything, that nobody can claim an exclusive right to some object, then some form of capitalism will exist, even if it's underground to elude the clutches of an authoritarian state.

>communism relies on the latest step of motivation as you are given everything you need but you work for self-expression. where your satisfaction comes not from that fact that you survived one more day without starving to death but because your product is valued by the hundreds or thousands of people.


And this is the ironic thing, that you talk about how one's work is "valued" when this whole thread has come about because people like you do NOT value the work of artists, in any meaningful sense...