>>7640

>the main idea of communism is that you as limited humans have limited ability to use things, you cant live in more than one house and you can't drive more than one car at once also you do not drive the car all day long


Maybe not, but if I'm not using my car and someone comes along and takes it for a drive, then if I need it for some reason, like an emergency, then I don't have access to it until it's brought back, or I have to go hunt someone else's car down to use it. (And who knows if THOSE cars will be in use by others or not, or be within walking distance.)

The amazing thing to me is that you don't address this by saying "oh, in the wonderful communist future everyone will have their own cars and houses and nobody will ever NEED to take other people's stuff", no, you have to invent a state of mind where nobody will CARE about keeping their stuff, and nobody will even care about being hurt or killed because they just magically get better.

Maybe that's fine for a sci-fi utopia, but until we stop living in the real world, people are going to need certain rights. Frankly, I think you're fooling yourself if you think people can be totally convinced to give up the idea of owning things. I think your outlook is blind to reality and wildly improbable.