>>7647

>you are splitting hairs here because this situation is not going to happen often, neither it is unsolvable.


If you own your own car, and your right to it is protected, the situation doesn't have to happen at all.

You're insisting on treating artists based on a philosophy or system that is not universally accepted (perhaps not even accepted by any but a very small group), that to work properly has to have a series of conditions that don't exist, and in many cases are very unlikely to exist. It's idealistic and utopian.

But it seems to be the religion under which you operate, so I can see that pointing out these problems will be brushed off.