>>8732
>What i'm wondering is whether there's any and how much inherent risk comes from running a website that allows 2-d guro/loli, specifically in the US.
Not involved with the site operations, but there SHOULDN'T be anything risky about it based off of what I know. First of all, despite what anyone tells you, the first amendment of the U.S. protects ALL "art" and speech.
>But, muh obscenity laws!
They're unconstitutional and built on nothing more than subjective judgement. They don't, and never will, carry any actual weight. Even then, there is already (Unconstitutional) laws in place in regards to prosecuting someone for possession of "extreme content" such as "cartoon child porn", and just look at how many cases there actually are of someone getting fined or sent to jail in the U.S. for it. There's only been five known cases. Four were people in possession of actual child porn. The only case where it was BECAUSE the guy had lolicon porn was tried in a military court, and they went after the guy, not because it was lolicon, because it was PORN (Which he wasn't suppose to have in the first place).