>>8788
I'm not blaming any amorphous group. People don't just start magically believing something because such and such "intellectual" wrote something in a magazine or editorial nobody cares about outside of a small circle. The seeds already existed and that's why it grew into something with real influence. Average, everyday people have to back it up for that to happen.

You're right about it being in England in the sixties, but I think there was some of that here too. Do you think those neocon Jews were bullshitting as part of a master plot?