Ok… had some rest.
Was a little bit over due.

If I analyze my specific situation a bit more
rationally, the major problem was that several
ideas clashed together into one big picture.
I will go and dissect which aspects of given
'big picture' were the ones that fascinated
me and try to reproduce the same fascination
under a different context.
Explore the meta of the sensation so to speak.
————————————————Regarding age:

I agree with onix in the point, shifting
the focus back to depiction of underage
characters, It really is the ROLE the character
is presenting and not the PHYSIQUE alone.

EXAMPLE:
The role a small child, let's say 5-14yrs,
represents (innocent, purely naive, no/limited
sexual consciousness, dependend etc.) is
VERY different from the role a 16-19yr teenie
represents.
The first role (child) is a big NO-GO for me,
not because of the law or the influence of
society but because it simply does not ring
my bell.
For me, personally this role is boring, monotone
and lame.
Maybe the reason I'm not big into cutsie-manga.
The characters are representing a similar role.

Puberty changes us.
During a very short period of time, there is
a hard-shift in character, behaviour, the role
that the very same person as just a few month
before represents.
Some teenies (16-`19yr) experience an
'outburst', overly sexualizing themselves,
curiosity, the drive for the attention of
the opposite sex, adventurousness and some
form of unpredictable crazyness, leading to
decisions that… … well fuck logic and reason.
I see that role as disgusting and sexy at the
same time.
For me, that mixture is a big turn-on.

Yes, onix, you are right.
It is not physique,
it is the Role.
Age under this perspective is only a logical
epiphenomenon, due to human biology.
———————————————-

Regarding Art:

I am absolutely on Reg's side on that one.
His opinions about art are the most honest,
reasonable and well-formed I have heard for
a long time.

Fiction and Reality are two distinct fields.
As a human being it is our job to draw and
cross
the line in between those two fields,
defining ourselves in the process.

The art's job is, in my opinion, to delight
us with the emotions, sensations, reality
denies us.
Both, the delight and the deny are right and
necessary.

Fiction may present us with great, bright
visions about travelling among the stars,
challenging our fears or evolving ourselves.
Crossing that line, making fiction become
reality in this case might be the best
thing we can do.

Fiction may present us with dark, horrible,
and lustful fantasies.
Crossing that line, might be the worst thing
we, as humans can do.

Our decisions about crossing and not crossing
define us.
———————————————
Regarding Morals in art:

TO HELL WITH THEM.
———————————————
Thank you both.
Honestly.