>>9308
Wow, You probably spent all day to write that rant but it looks greatly as some kind of usual feminist propaganda again because you blame some mystical forces that prevent you from expressing yourself but at the same time you refuse to participate here or anywhere where you are very welcome.

Also It is a bit strange that all those female dominated spaces seems to be so secret and invisible maybe they are in the real world?


>.A reason I hesitate to post my own art and fiction is that I think people may want or expect content more catered to male tastes. Not even the genders of the characters or whatever, I love drawing female victims, that's fine, just those little stylistic cultural cues. Just like a lot of the content here misses the mark for me, my content would miss the mark for a lot of people here. Lately I just don't know where else to put it, the art, anyway.
Maybe you should stop assuming nonsense and try it? or you are afraid that your ideology will be broked when instead of hating your work everyone will like it?


But actually in some aspects you describe women pretty accurately, I totally disagree with all that idiotic oppression thing but other stuff is spot on.

>Women also just, honestly, tend to be thrown by certain anatomy and tropes in male-generated content. A lot of the female bodies throw us off by looking like the man has never seen a real woman or touched a real boob. We usually don't like ridiculous balloon tits, unless it's actually a breast expansion kink instead of just treated as normal. So many women I know are like, "what is with men and the giant tits." Lesbians don't find the giant tits any more appealing. That doesn't even hit the part of my brain that recognizes it as a woman's body, all I see is men being weird again. Other bad anatomy includes: not knowing how to draw a pussy at all, really lazy half-assed pussies (especially noticeable when the cocks in the same art are lovingly detailed), not understanding that the vagina is in the back of the vulva and not dead center (yes, really!) and pubic bones just basically not existing or obeying the laws of physics. Also the titty bouncing in animation always just looks wrong, the boobs almost never lie realistically on the chest, etc. It just makes the art look lower quality.


Thanks for confirming what I mentioned about female primitivism here, because this is exactly what I call being down to earth. And even your reasoning refers to "the man has never seen a real woman or touched a real boob" as you assume that men are supposed to follow reality.
But what actually happens here is that we redefine that reality, we make it look as we want it to be not as it is.
You probably cannot even imagine what amount science goes into finding a way to break those laws of physic and make a loli girl fit an object in her vagina which is bigger than she is herself. Or how much tweaking goes into breasts to make then look just right.


>>While I think I met one woman who did like ahegao, most women I know hate ahegao. We just think it looks stupid. No one really makes that face when sexually overstimulated or whatever. Like, what is that even supposed to be? Why are the only two facial expressions "blank doll" and "ahegao"? It's bad art, it doesn't evoke what it's trying to evoke at all. Ways to give women a ruined orgasm: put ahegao in it just when they're about to come.

If you dislike ahegao it implies that you are very self-centered which is again what I mentioned before in another way because when you are focusing on someone else you need that person to be emotionally responsive. or else what the purpose of all what you did if is ended with nothing?

You assume that men have sex with women to have orgasms? yes maybe those brainless baboons who are sometimes called "alpha males" are like that
But creative man usually does not seek orgasm we seek to keep all that arousal for as long as possible. Orgasm is typically the end of the road, you have it and you lose all interest in anything.

This female self-centeredness is actually kinda useful for men too sometimes especially for primitive men, but many women are just to stupid to understand that men fuck them not to have orgasms, but to get that ahegao expression on her face. If one wanted to have an orgasm, that's what we have our hands for. Sex with a woman is precisely to get her response as a primary goal. Men see women as women kind of game which can to be manipulated into certain result by pushing the right buttons. (this result depends on personal tastes, either it is to make her happy or to make her cry)
And at least I personally expect a woman to do same for me but unfortunately most women are just to dumb to understand that or just don't care. I never met any woman so far who would be interested in doing the same thing to me as I do to her. The best that happens is if I find someone who kinda unintentionally behaves as I want her to behave and I get some mediocre experience.

This is actually a big issue not only in sex but in all relationships, because women cannot understand how to manipulate experience of their opponent/friend they are either your slaves or enemies, there is no that middle ground when woman would challenge/provoke you and then maintain win/lose ratio to keep things interesting.

>>Related to this, there's some research that even in kids, boys tend to identify with male characters in media, while girls can identify with male or female characters with equal ease, which is why so much children's media has male protagonists, because there's more money in cross-appeal. That itself reinforces the trend, because there are fewer female characters (and variety in those characters, for all the diversity and complexity in girls out there) for girls to latch onto, so they pretty much have to learn to make do with male characters whether they want to or not. How much of this is socialization, who knows, probably a lot. Boys who start to identify with female characters seem to be punished for it and learn not to do that again. Which I think is quite unfortunate.

This is total nonsense because in reality half of the women on the internet are men in disguise we do identify as female characters as well, but not as real female characters. We never become self-centered. so even as a female character, we are actually "guys with tits" we use our femininity to manipulate other people. That femininity is just one of the superpowers we want to have. If the guy imagines himself as a woman it is not some kind of mother or innocent girl it is the superhot bitch that can make other guys cum just by touching them.

Ranma 1/2 is a good example of what it means for a guy to be a girl. It is just a body, not the mind.

In a similar way, female fiction is also portraying women in male bodies. Just like in the male fiction where we create a hyper-feminine body with the male mind women create a hypermasculine body with the female mind.

In fact, transgender people also mentally remain the same as they were born. most of the time MTF women are still men and FTM men are still women. this is kinda the reason why they are also pretty attractive to straight men and women.