>>9349

Wow! Thanks for the elaborate response.
A very interesting read, indeed.
Enjoyed it.

I feel a little bit abashed, because you
portrayed me as a much nicer person as
I truly am.

But I'll get over it. ;)
———————————————
For me, personally, the insight you provided
with your reply resembles something like the
'the last missing piece of a puzzle'.

It confirmed many of my preexisting
expectations but also named stuff that I didn't
really understood in a more approachable
way.

Good stuff.
———————————————–
For me, there are two questions that seem
to be the next logical step to take:

Now, that we got a rough understanding,
about how the genders 'break down'…

[1]
… How can we enhance the overall experience
online by means of interaction and engagement
for both genders?

Clearly, having men and women interact on the
same topic is advantageous.
It's far more interesting to exchange ideas
with the sex/gender I am into.
Really.
10/10 , would jerk off to it.

I'm not a big fan of the separation that is
obviously going on between fem./masc. .

Let's 'tear down that wall'! -Kennedy style ;)


[2]
… How can we improve our artworks (images/writing)
to be more 'persuasive'?

The business-bitch(TM) inside me has a gut-feeling,
that by targeting female tastes will impress many
masculine tastes as well, maybe offering new/fresh
ideas, aka. better fappening experiences.

That doesn't mean, that there has
to be M/M stuff everywhere,
but the overall idea of:

A: communicating context, even in an abstract way
B: communicating emotion, of both sides of the action
C: delivering a statement, more than a story.

I suspect that the female fantasy is more similar
to how we experience 'dreams'

Artistically spoken, it's more the *collage* type,
than the *comic* type,
where comic is interpreted strictly as a sequential
order of events.
More vague, less concrete, emotion over action.
—————————————————–

Maybe I'm wrong… bash me.