>>9368
>Because I've seen disparaging remarks made against women and decided that I wouldn't like to be a vocal part of a community that couldn't see value in me. That was my decision based on the factors at hand. But if you ask for a female perspective, I'm willing to give it.

You must be confusing something or I have to attribute that to female logic again. Comments about women are not comments about YOU unless you claim that all women are like hivemind borg and they are all same. what is said about women, in general, should not concern you at all as individual, because if you disagree with those claims you are different from them all. If you disagree wahst is said about women you can try to argue and prove that claim wrong if you care or you can ignore it if you don't care, but taking them personally just because you are a woman is the pinnacle of idiocy.

Even if you come to some incel-female-hater forum where guys discuss how they murder women you can still calmly discuss things with them and prove them wrong. If you get in one on one conversation very likely even those extreme haters will make 180-degree turn and start kissing your butt in private conversation. Individually we have good expectations about people we meet even if we hate them as a group.

It is still up to individual judgement, what kind of people we see good or bad for ourselves, so it is not necessary to disagree every time on what people say about you as well.

Finally, you still did not provide any examples of porn/art communities where women are unwelcome or mistreated. as if it happened to you that you post some story or picture and get bad responses or that your opinion was somehow disrespected because you are a woman.


>>9371
Those situations look like reasonable things why ban people but it depends on how it was done:

>In my time moderating Ive had to ban:
>People who ask other people to cut themselves

How exactly you ask someone to cut themselves? of course, if someone is bluntly demanding you to slice your wrists and post the photo that's just stupid and worth of ban for stupidity.

But you can do it in other ways too, for example, talk with that former cutter and tell her that you love women who cut themselves or you just like such content. Or you can say something that "cuts are so sexy" or argue that "cutting is OK" and what you do in that situation? Do you ban someone for the wrong kink or wrong idea?


>People who literally try to berate artists, calling their art shitty in DMs, to devalue their work so that they can demand requests for the purposes of critique.

Same thing here: calling someone's art shitty is plain dumb. If it is really shitty, everyone already knows that including the artist. But you can do that with sarcasm like "You draw perfect horse butts" or you can provide totally valid criticism about what is wrong in that artwork.

So where you draw the line? someone says "the colors of your picture seem to be little off" and the response of the mod is "How dare you to berate artists! BAN for you!"



>Are you talking about a server where everyone can do what they want?
>Or a server where you can do what you want?
>And, is there a point at which stopping someone from acting in a certain way *is* allowing someone else the freedom to act in their own way? Like, if you allow murder, youre enabling one person to take the right to live grom another. Similarly, if you allow aggressive behavior, youre just allowing brash people to take the ability to speak from sensitive people.


A server where everyone can do what they want, except spam.

If someone starts discussing trade war with China or feminism on the dickgirl thread such messages have to be removed because this is not the place for that not because it is somehow wrong and the poster has to be warned not to do it here. ideally, the server could have a function to move parts of thread into a special zone where people can continue their flame war freely without disrupting the experience of those who are not interested.
If it is an appropriate place and appropriate topic it should be allowed, no matter how offensive it is for sensitive people.
either way, bans are unnecessary, you can just delete inappropriate messages. or in some extreme cases demand people not to talk to each other or mention each other in any way.

The purpose of the moderator must be to manage server related issues not interpersonal relationships of people there.
Unlike real life where you can actually hut someone or take their life everyone is equal on the internet and nobody can hurt anyone.
I think an exception is when someone is revealing some private information about someone else with intent to damage their reputation.


>>9374
>>Onix, describe the value, that you provided on this thread.

I am providing value on other threads. Here I am just presenting my opinion like everyone else.
Normally, value of everyone of us is supposed to be close to zero over a long time.

Just like under capitalism, when you buy something that has value but also give back something of equal value making overall balance zero
if it is not zero somebody was ripped off.
The more value you provide the more you can take back.