>>9855
Going off-topic a little now but I want to respond (this is probably my last comment in the thread)

Is it hypersensitive to, for example, say that wage theft is bad, and online speech encouraging wage theft is bad? Of course not. But if you are an employer who exploits his workers, and who thinks working class people are lazy and dumb and deserve to be exploited, you might roll your eyes and say such speech is oversensitive, and workers should stop complaining – because you do not respect the group of interest (workers) or agree with the message (wage theft is bad).

Replace the working class with women, and abusive employers with misogynists. I've seen your comments Onix so I know you see women as inferiors in real life. Of course you consider speech against misogyny "hypersensitive." You do not respect the group of interest (women) or agree with the message (women shouldn't be treated like inferiors).

"The US healthcare system is amoral and causes thousands of unnecessary deaths" ← is this hypersensitive speech? Of course not. This is valid expression of one's moral view on a topic that affects the wellbeing of millions of people. There are billions of women, and violence against women is widespread, because the view that women are inferior is widespread. It's ok to express one's moral view on this topic.

Anyway, while misogyny is bad and I wish it stopped, my point is only that saying women are inferior or subhuman in real life, on an imageboard dedicated to drawn fantasy violence against women, blurs the line between fantasy and reality. You can still think it, just don't say it over and over again on this board.

Alright, this is my last comment in the thread. Back to guro.