>>10044

Well, your behavior doesn't
correspond to the claim you're
making.
Being of an 150+ IQ would
be recognized.
I don't see that in you, sugar.

No, it's not about playing
a spy game,
it's about maintaining privacy.
Which is rare these days.

I agree, that the vast majority
of people online have no clue
on how to use cryptocurrencies.
Which is a GOOD THING for
governance, stability and
-of course-
the big banks.
Which is a BAD THING for any
person trying to conduct business
without any interference of unforeseen
parties.

If the current trend of increasing
regulation and interference of money
transfers aimed at regular ppl continues,
cryptocurrencies might be the only option,
'average joe' will be left with in the
future.

Of course,
well in favor of the general governance,
'average joe' is too lazy or,
too undereducated to use/maintain crypto
themselves.

Which is the reason,
why centralized also governed crypto-exchanges/apps and bullshit
exist, trying to easy-fy the usage of
said money-substitute.

Based on this reason(and others as well),
I made the suggestion,
to set the commission prices higher,
than some average person would be willing
to pay.
Pricing, in my sense is used as a tool,
to narrow down the selection of potential
customers.
Down to the 'few' that:
- are willing/able to pay well
- are due to high education or resources
able to afford and manage the use
of crypto
- are due to high education aware
of the potential consequences and
eager to maintain privacy/anonymity
themselves.

Of course, if someone would follow my
suggestions, he/she will DEFINITIVELY
loose customers.

The trash ones.