>>10063

Well, I know what is posted here
on GC, but I didn't assume,
that the artist (OP) posting
the initial question of this thread
would target GC exclusively.

Most artistic content here on GC
isn't even worth a cent.
And I wouldn't even spend my time
looking at it intensively.

But, GC is(amongst others)
a good platform
for initial getting exposure,
due to its accessability,
pushing your content in front of
the right eyes.

I referenced Armando Huerta
only to point to a certain style
or quality of work that an artist
should be able to deliver to expect
making money from it.
Armando Huerta, as you mentioned
clearly falling in the spectrum of
fine arts being the upper end of the
monetizeable spectrum.

Where, on the lower end of the
spectrum you mind find works of a
quality similar to Cameron Steward's
feminine portraits (BW-only) which
he regularly posts on his instagram.
(I know, this guy is capable of more,
but this
specific style of his
is a good example).

If you, as an artist,
are not able to deliver quality
somewhere in between this spectrum,
chances are, you will not make any
good money at all.
Do not expect to get paid for some
sub-mediocre trash. Because this
trashy 'cheap fappening material' is
littered all over the web.

Specific poses, actions are not
relevant to deem an artwork illegal.
The depiction of some
(possibly specific) human being,
objectified in the context
of erotic and violence/harm in any
form is enough for most states/countries.

I think, I have worked out this topic
well enough.