>>10068

I think you need to take more care to get in context.

Because yes, what you say is valid under certain circumstances and I will not argue that you are wrong but the whole point is that we typically do OC and not real people. And furthermore, I use lolis not so much as children but as a representation of certain character type so they actually do not even behave like children.
If those commissions involve drawing pictures of real children in sexual situation the law actually makes some sense because it is about real people.

But you just brag in with your totally irrelevant claims and try to scare everyone that they will get in jail for essentially drawing stick figures like Shadman. Or promise millions for the pictures that take 5 minutes to draw.
next time just make it clear what you are talking about to avoid stupid misunderstandings.

The word "Artist" is applicable not only to those who draw by hand. Any technology is ok, like photography, sculpture and I use 3d "photography". and my art is focused on the story and meaning.
In fact, people who draw that kind of commissions as you describe are not even really artists but painters because they do not create anything they just do the exact specific request.

In fact, all art is about the meaning and that's what makes it different from porn and other services that have no meaning of any kind just customer satisfaction. Art is supposed to change the world not just making money.

By the way, if you are looking for "artists" to draw those realistic pictures why don't you just hire Chinese workers? They will draw anything any style for you for pennies as long as it does not require any creativity and you can sell it with 1000% profit.