>>10067
Yeah I know that joke about Australia.
But it is more about selling porn legally not about putting every woman with flat chest in jail who dares to put sexy outfit or make erotic photo.

Perception is subjective and cannot be used as argument in court, if there are no hard standards and rules you cannot be prosecuted criminally. (although civil trials are possible where very low level proof is required and decisions are almost random expression of the judge's mood)
In fact in the modern world it is pretty hard to get convicted for anything at all, because you can make totally ridiculous excuses and win if prosecutor will not prove your excuses to be wrong. Although it greatly depends on your ability to speak nonsense with the serious face and not burst in laughter.


So in our situation if someone wants to convict you for a drawing, he end to use objective standards to prove that it can be perceived as child at the specified level using numerical mathematical proof. possibly on the character which is not even anatomically correct human. Obviously it cannot be done in principle for fictional characters. Any prosecutor who will try that will become a laughing stock.

I would even really love to see how one will try to prove that the girl with the dick of the size of a horse or a pussy which can fit entire horse is a child. And funniest of all if someone accuses you for some character being perceived as a child you can make more pictures where you ruin that perception.

So it is not that bad if world is becoming ridiculous.