>>10134

I have to admit,
it actually seems like
a circular argument.

In short:
If it 'hooks' you,
I assume, the Art has to be good enough
to be at least worth something.

Right?

If the post I was replying to,
would explicitly state,
that the free stuff out there
was actually good,
but as soon as you spend money,
to see what is beyond the paywall,
you are greeted by the disappointment
that the artist cherry picked his/her
best works to lure you behind closed
doors just to feed you the trash and
the leftovers, effectively making you
pay for it,
then I would have agreed.