>>10351
maybe I am not expressing my thoughts well enuogh too, as I should make more coherent theory before describing it. and you bring up some point that needs extra thinking to get everything right.

But as you noticed I use word creator in the pretty broad way which is just what brought us into existence.

Yes, the idea that our purpose is actually to overthrow our creator is pretty interesting and I even could imagine it in the religious perceptive that God created humans with exactly this purpose as something most logical and pleasing.
In fact, this seems to be a dream of every creator including our parents - to make something greater than yourself.


transcendence does exist.
in fact, we can consider the entire world as a quantum computer running reality simulation algorithm. this computer will be a supernatural object because is sort of outside of our universe we cannot alter algorithms which it is using. You can abstract those algorithms in various ways expressing them in the form of laws of nature.

On top of the laws of nature, we have a society with its own laws and rules. They also simulate a certain kind of reality, describing to you what is right and wrong and how you are supposed to behave what to think etc.
those rules can be changed but they are also transcendent because they will exist indefinitely until some force will change them.

I don't know what author to recommend that Marx is not a philosopher he is an economist

I would not even say that it is some kind of specific philosophy just that we should reject all our culture and traditions and use our own head to decide what is right or wrong and question everything.
in contrast to what that Slavoj Zizek says that we should rather obey some unquestionable dogmas.