>>10446
>>10487
>>10484
>>10486

You all missed my point.

I didn't said banning lolis is the way to go. I said: going further in the loli/pedophilia road (than where gurochan currently is) will likely lead to further troubles in the future for the site, and I'd strongly advise not doing so. Contrary to some vocal advocate around here, the current statu quo should suffice.

I also said that, although this is not my kind of stuff at all, I'm giving it a pass due to how rare guro material is. So, this only my personal view on this whole thing.

In other words: You do you, I do me.

>>10484

Let's make something clear. Even if, hypothetically, loli were to be banned, gurochan will still be visited as it will still be needed. Guro material is just too rare to be ignored. In fact, there is people on this site (who are no fence sitters on this subject) waiting for that to be the case.

Also, the fact that other sites may contain granny stuff, as you claim, isn't relevant. And for the wrinkly squared face they do have, they tend to be occasional (even on TheDarkSpot). Hell, even gurochan have some here and there at times. (and again, this isn't of my taste)

Well, unless anything above 18 is to be considered a granny, that is…

Regarding cuteness, it is completely subjective. For both the artist and their audience. It simply isn't intrinsically related to youth.