>>6166
Well, I'm not sure if I'm seeing a left-wing slant, or if I just have a strange definition of "left-wing". Put me down for right-wing ultra-libertarianism (yeah, I managed to synthesize Stirner's egoism with explicitly right-wing ideas, so what?)

As for the fascism debate, it's possible that multiple people are right. It's pretty explicit in the doctrines of the people who defined fascism that there is no "fascism". It doesn't exist. It's an oxymoron. "German fascism", "Italian fascism", "American fascism", these are all real ideologies, but unmodified "fascism" is a series of political theories that you use to discern a "national identity", and then mix that with the other theories to create an ideology. This makes it hard to discuss, since the amount of common threads are few and far between. Even the biggest connection in real fascist movements, the public corporatocracy, isn't necessarily baked into the ideology. It's entirely possible (at least in theory) that your national spirit is too collectivist to be driven by personal gain, and thus you remove it.
It's very strange, but that's how it is.