>>10611
>let's say you own 10000$ bonds and buy 1 ounce of gold which supposedly costs 10 000$ at that time because everyone is rushing to buy it to save whatever they still can. hyperinflation happens the value of bonds go to 10$ after hyperinflation when 3 zeroes are crossed out, but gold now only costs 1000$ in new money which largely represents old money in terms of buying power.
You do realize that YOU'RE STILL THINKING IN SMALL TERMS. There's a global economy out there where what's valuable in one country (E.G. water in Africa) is a commodity in the next. When one country's economy crashes, another can profit from it. And, the idea that you're going to make things more "fair" is not going to stop people from fucking off to other countries where they don't have to put up with your bullshit. Then there's also the fact that you have other countries who WANT these newfound refugees that you made, such as how Australia offered instant Visas to the farmers that South Africa kicked out: http://archive.ph/w6JTh
>If you distribute all stock assets to all people on earth equally you only get about 100$ a month of dividends for each.
>So it is really not that much unless you live in some Nigerian slums or deep Chinese village.
So, you're entire argument is based around YOU not being creative enough to know how to earn money in a way that you can double, triple quadruple, etc. the amount that you currently have.
>your calculation that everything will be back in 5 years is also wrong because this is only valid at the PE ratio of 5
Your stupid "PE ratio" doesn't exist in the scenario of "Dividing up all the world's wealth and giving equally to everyone" because everything is restarting from ZERO. Let's break it down. THERE IS $36,800,000,000,000 OF "PHYSICAL MONEY" IN THE ENTIRE WORLD: http://archive.ph/rRFmI
Now you're dividing that up between an estimated 7.735 billion people on the planet: https://populationstat.com/
Now, when you divide that all up, you give everyone around $4757.50. Now, this is the value of EVERYTHING divided up equally. So, where do things go now? Well, some people may have something that you want or need that you do not have (Whether it be a physical item or a service). So you agree to trade something of near equal "value" (Because you and the other person both agree that item you're "selling" is worth the same as the item that you are "buying"). And, the study goes that when five years have gone buy, this form of trading results in a society that is near exact to the one we currently exist in (With the only "differences" being so minimal that it is less than a fraction of a fraction of a percentage).

Also, that's EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN RUSSIA WHEN THE NEW GOVERNMENT REPLACED THE USSR AFTER IT'S COLLAPSE.