Honestly I thought the term "fictional child pornography" was somewhat unwarranted, as it is more often about schediaphilia and fictiophilia rather than actual pedophilia. The same reason I like guro artwork and love gorish comedy while simultaneously fainting at the sight of blood in real life. But on second thought guro could be tecnically narrowed to "fictional murder" so, I guess it is technically correct?. The real issue here is the 'fictional' part, gurochan was already one of the few remaining sites that allowed the content (as long as it was mixed with the grotesque), while personally I find it rather disturbing when age is involved (for example the creepy 'elementary schooler' mangas), I do understand the difference between real and fictional, as it is the only thing separating the enjoyable from the abominable, and banning anything fictional no matter how much you hate it is never ok. I understand this time there was no other choice because the hosts are cunts and the so called troll was an ever bigger cunt that disturbed the cunt nest, so the Admins did the only thing they could, but if internet censorship has ever thought me anything is that it is always a slippery slope. It's always the same, first loli goes, then furry goes, then anything goes. I'd seriously advice the Admins to start looking for a new host, at best you have 1 or 2 years before the host keeps tightening the knot on what or what is not allowed.