Not the OP but I agree with him/her so here's my two cents:
>>87
> You are a real hypocrite. :) Kill women save pets LOL
Kill *fictional* woman. Save *real* pets. If people were killing real women, I (and presumably he) would have a problem with it. If people were merely drawing pictures of dogs and cats being killed, I (and possibly he) would not have a problem with it.
> But anyway, gorechan is not gurochan so stuff that you see there is not supposed to be all sexy and cute. If I am not mistaken that real-life gore is at least officially not intended to be a fapping material (unless you are a real pervert :)
Maybe not officially idk, but it's attached to gurochan and loliboard, which are both sexual. And a cursory glance at it reveals terms such as "ADULT ONLY", "Genital removal" and "Cute dead Girls".
> you ... should treat it rather as fact of life which got documented, rather than complaining that someone brought it up for you to observe.
> In other words: don't shoot the messenger.
I see your point, but allowing content like that encourages it to be produced in greater quantities (and the production of it of course causes harm), especially on a fetish board.
>>110
> [animals] don't have as much brain power as humans, so by default they take death and pain a lot better.
No, they don't. Sure they might not feel a more cerebral sense of despair (or so we think), but they do have pain receptors and the mental equipment for registering pain. They might not be able to think, but they can feel.
> Just know that if humans didn't deform animals by forcing them to inbreed, your beloved housepets would probably bite your head off and feed your entrails to their offspring.
But then they wouldn't be our housepets. That's like saying it's okay to kill someone because if they were a serial killer, you would have to in self-defense.
And btw, I don't eat animal products, so I could according to you have the right to be preachy.