>>228
Alot of older artists from gurochan dont appreciate it.

>>229
We allow loli-guro, there is even an entire board. There is just a difference between loli-guro and loli-guro-3dcg or loli-3dcg.

>>233
lolis are not banned, and that is not what is being proposed. lolis and 3dcg lolis are 2 very different categories.

>>234
Again, "3D lolis" are the only thing we are discussing here.

>Even discussing the idea of such a ban is very damaging to GC because it tells that half of the current userbase is unwelcome here.
I understand your sentiments, but i dont think that 3DCG porn accounts for half of gurochans traffic, the 3dcg board itself is only the 5th most active, and of that, loli-3dcg is a relatively small portion. Lets not use hyperbole.


>I highly doubt if there will be that many loli hating artists and that much content they make to bring any reasonable traffic to GC. If such a ban happened that is going to be the final nail in the GC coffin.
People seem to think gurochan is dead for some reason. Its not as active as it used to be still regularly eclipses 200~ posts a day, acting as if its close to death, and banning a single category of pornography would "be the final nail" is not reflective of reality.

We are not saying we will ban it or we will not, we are merely holding a civil discussion on whether it belongs here. Even if it is finally ruled against, there is the possibility of containment as opposed to banishment.

Its also worth noting that you can dislike lolis (especially 3dcg lolis) without disliking guro. They are 2 seperate categories, and, whats the name of this site?