>>295
>The problem is "loli" 3dcg always creeps into raw pedo-3dcg, completely unrelated to guro whatsoever over time.

Why do you think it is a problem at all?
naturally, if someone is posting their own original content it is expected to be all in one place. It would be dumb idea to post guro pictures in one place and non guro in another.

>Toddlers doing bdsm is just not guro. Period.
Who made you an authority to decide that?


>Also, posting deliberately realistic and accurate 3D underage is asking for trouble. This isn't the same as posting 3d "anime" lolis which, at least, are stylized enough to get the "muh art" excuse.

It is very interesting where did you see any of such "realistic and accurate" 3d content. As much as I know almost all 3d content in existence is pretty easy to distinguish from the real. You need to be extremely autistic not to see the difference.

>But hey! If you guys *really* want this kind of stuff, so be it! This site's reputation somehow managed to get even worse with the "pedo-site" moniker lately, all thanks to you.

Yeah, toddlers getting torn in pieces - totally ok. Same toddlers doing BDSM - oh no! that's going to damage site reputation LOL


If something is going to damage the reputation is precisely attempt to make strict policies what is allowed and what not because at the moment you start judging the content you become responsible for all the content which you have on the site.