>>1542
>it does not agree with your central argument, which is that high-value men do not want to fuck women. that is an interpretation you are fitting onto the article.

This is not my central argument, in the conversation about FGM my argument was that like in that article the main factor is not fidelity or virginity but *marigebility* aka How well a woman is suited to being wife. And the reason why women do is to indicate their suitability for that role and obtain a high value man who is especially interested in that role.


as for high value men not being interested in sex that is just logical and practical conclusion, because if you spend so much time working and your main goal is status and success then you just don't give that much importance to sex naturally. You will not become high value man if rather than working you will be spending time with women or jerking on porn. It is simply impossible.

In fct it often happens that regardless how low is sex drive of women, women will get frustrated by the absolute absence of their husband who does not even bother to have any contact with her but if something just throws money at her and leaves.

>perhaps my argument would be more clear if I had said "edging addiction."
yes it woud be but then your idea about dopamine "spike" is broken because addiction if not for reward but rather for process
In some way this is valid for drug addiction as well because people are addicted not so much to drugs as they are addicted to process of obtaining those drugs

and this can be also extended to sex as we can speculate that it may be just as easy to make woman addicted to sex as a guy if only she had decent sex drive initially to bootstrap that addiction and reconfigure all her live into sexual pleasure seeking.

This also explains why such a great lengths are went to prevent boys and girls from feeling that pleasure. Anyone who experienced that too much will be considered as "damaged" and unsuitable for marriage.