>>1636

Au contraire, monsieur! I got your idea completely - with the exception that I thought you were still complaining, because you are "still angry" (>>1608).

I even understand your plot with the analogy of addiction to drugs. But I disagree with your opinion on the matter of benefit. You are confusing cause and effect. The men want submissive women, hence they set this cruel rules. And in communities where this can happen women have no other choice than to follow, because also other restrictions are enforced. It is a take it or leave it situation.

And this is my main point: Your "torment" was reasonable, FGM is absolutely not. To say women benefit from circumcision is the same as to say a rape victim is at fault.