>>1641

>And this is my main point: Your "torment" was reasonable, FGM is absolutely not.
And you did nothing to prove your point.
It is not that I support FGM procedure either but my idea is that this is no different from what we consider completely valid and acceptable things.

>women have no other choice than to follow,
No, women do have choice. Nobody enforces this procedure it is done purely because of future benefit. It is not even some kind of rule, you can read the article provided by sage above where it is all well described.
Not even all men want submissive women but men whom women want to marry usually do want submissive women. This is even valid in western world where carrier women are complaining that men don't want them conveniently omitting that "rich successful" men don't want them.

So there is no reason to sympathise with those "poor" women. If you want to be successful then be ready to suffer create your personal hell for yourself if you want. Want a good husband then make sacrifice, give up on pleasure forever and become his slave living in the golden cage.

Yes of course woman can't make that choice herself at the time when she is being cut just like a child can't make a choice to learn how to read or not, but I think we discussed issue of consent above.

In general all human life is never ending self torture where you make yourself suffer expecting future benefits that never really come. If people choose to do that to themselves then it is their own problem.