>>1687
>May I draw your attention to some details of these two sentences:
the devil is in the details that you skipped :) "a *large* number of females " In the societies where you are allowed to have large number of females you need to be ultra wealthy to be able to do so.
And of course the best for female woud be to marry some local oligarch who preferably never even gets home from his work then have parties using his money and raise children on his money as well. Or even better like in the western world mary Jeff Bezos divorce him next day and get half of his money(or even better all his money LOL). Too bad you never get what is the best for you :)

>The article points out, that the cutting was passed through from the highest social levels to the lowest. So its not done to marry a rich man or to climb the social ladder, the reason is to get a marriage at all. Women don't have a real choice.

And what is your reason to believe so? I did not notice anything in the article that woud imply "not done to climb the social ladder" in my opinion it is much more logical that it was passed to down precisely in attempt of those lower class women to climb up the social ladder not because some pisspoor homeless guy is demanding properly cicumcised wife to marry him. While to even get a chance to be considered as possible wife by high class man she has to be cut. he has almost limitless choice of candidates to be super picky.
And this is how culture of rich people gets passed down in general.

The basic universal principle is that poor people just can't make any demands they take what they can get while rich people choose best from the best.
If you want to marry someone who is better than yourself you will have to follow their demands and if you marry someone below yourself you can make your own demands.
That is the price of female hypergamy.


>So why not get the best out of both "worlds"?
Because it does not work that way, there is no such thing as "equality" everyone gets different set of privileges and obligations, if you are lucky you may get only privileges if you are unlucky you only get obligations or stay somewhere in between but on average you trade obligations to privileges.
If you want privileges of traditional woman you have to take obligations of traditional woman and if you want privileges of traditional man you take obligations of traditional man.
if woman wants to be a man she can: find a good job, make good money them find a pisspoor man who never worked in his live and keep him at home on the leash where he will take care of your children I am sure she will even find someone who will be willing to get completely castrated to prove his fidelity or whatever else she wants. You will work like slave and he will live like a slave.

But so far we see that women prefer to stay at home and be fully supported by a man rather than working super hard and providing for the family. That comes at a cost of losing freedom.
Don't you think it woud be stupid to expect that you get all that easy life for free?
In general if your partner is suffering in hell he or she will not allow you to have fun either.