>>15052
no, the mock session should be us doing things naturally. vote on it, use it normally, and then if people have complaints with it, vote ourselves back. people aren't invested or compelled to involve themselves in mock trials that don't involve anything real, and if rationality alone wont reveal the flaws of a system, a single mock session likely wont do enough, either. plus, it might be more complicated to go back and forth by testing the new system before we do a formal vote on it. i don't really feel compelled to say much more on the subject, but consider these concerns.