>>15571
Again, people will use the tool to do things you don't like. Would you ban photography because someone took a picture of a politician you don't like? Actually, that's a good jumping off point.

Photography. Anyone can do it and photographers were seething mad when cameras became more and more affordable to the general public. Now everyone with a iphone is a potential photographer and the below average photographers are desperate to set themselves apart from the pumpkin spice chugging bimbo at starbucks and are willing to spend thousands to do so.
Meanwhile 200 years ago, photography wasn't considered art. It was called a mutation, theft, an insult to art, the death of art. Photography stole your soul, photography would allow you steal art from galleries and put them out of business, photography would allow you to duplicate the mona lisa and no one would ever pay to go see it!

It always boils down to money. If the common person can do something that's been gatekept to the rich? It's bad, it's awful, it needs to be regulated and stopped.
Anyway-
You can stay mad at the melted anime bimbo guys all you want. They're just doing what they want without someone slapping their hands and demanding tribute. I'm not going to lie and say it's not annoying when someone posts every single image they've managed to generate, or doesn't take the extra steps to make it look better, but hey, look at Deviant art.
It's filled with autistic MS painters who think they're gods, who refuse to learn art history or even the basics of composition and perspective- they post every single piece of garbage that leaves their fingertips with no eye for quality. It's the same thing.