>>16878

>I was not even referring to humans but to cats and dogs and other cute things that we keep as pets

I'll admit, I was thrown off by your use of quotation marks. When you originally said
>we actually love keeping parasites when they are cute, we usually call them our "pets"
I thought you were saying you call the girls you decide to let parasitize you pets, not that you were literally talking about pets.

But even still, the fact remains that you are comparing women to animals - thereby at least implying that women are less human than men

>if woman in the family is not getting attention from her husband that's emotional abuse if man is not getting sex from his wife "you piece of shit are not entitled to getting it" is the response he will get if he mentions it.

These are different things. One of them is an emotional issue, and the other is a sexual issue. If the roles were reversed, the same should be true (with less extreme responses both ways, regardless of who's on what side). If a woman completely ignores her husband except when she wants to fuck, that's emotional abuse.

I'll admit that if she then complained about how her husband doesn't always want to have sex with her whenever she's in the mood, she would probably get a more sympathetic response, but that's a double standard, and if it happened often enough she would eventually be called out for it.

We see these kinds of double standards all the time: when a male teacher sleeps with his underage female students, he's branded a sick pedophile by everyone, but when a female teacher does the same thing with a male student, you can practically hear a chorus of "lucky him"s from most of the guys talking about it. But as it happened more often, and people actually started thinking about it, they realized that both are equally bad. (I understand there are probably pedos on this board who think active pedophilia should be legal, but hopefully my point gets across nonetheless)

(And just to clarify, I have no issue with fictional depictions - I openly admitted to liking Onix's work, after all)

> I guess you know that it is extremely unlikely thing for me to meet random woman who has identical or higher level of desire than mine even if we assumed that i am average man.

I was more saying that you seem to have an unusually high sex drive - you're the only person I've come across who claims to look at women and only think about sex no matter what. What happens when you see someone androgynous, do you start checking them for tits/pants bulge, or do you just ignore them entirely?

>term misogyny is stupid and has no value in discussions outside of making insults.

I was honestly not using it as an insult. You seem to believe that men are superior to women in some ways. That is textbook misogyny. To say otherwise would be like saying that believing all gay people should die isn't homophobic. I say it with no malice, just as I took no offense from when that other guy called me a moral fag and brainwashed feminist - to him those may as well be technical terms, even though I know he was using them in an attempt to upset/goad me.

I'm not saying you're a Nazi/Fascist, because I don't have enough evidence to make such a claim. But if you started putting a swastika as an image every time you posted something, and chanted "blood and soil!", I would feel justified calling you a Nazi

>when i see a woman I think "i wanna bang you" I don't have any other thoughts about her My only thoughts are what kind of kinks she have how perverted she is and is she going to find me attractive
>Just for reference what exactly do you manage to do with women at all? like besides talking about weather.

I imagine you must have male friends irl. What do you do with them? Unless all you do is talk about the girls you wanna fuck, or how you hate when your ballsack sticks to your taint, you could be just as easily doing it with girls involved.

Even regarding sexual topics, most women are happy to chat along if they feel comfortable around the guys in the group.

To answer your question of what I manage to do with them, it depends on the circumstances. At work we mostly joke around about various things, occasionally throwing in innuendos; complain about our coworkers; or talk about our lives.

Outside of work, I will occasionally go out for drinks and some music with friends, but the music and the booze limit the extent of talking. Sometimes we'll get together to play board games or Jackbox games (usually with drinks involved). In these scenarios we're usually focused on competing, but small talk and shit talk fill the gaps

And on occasion I have sat down with a female friend and *GASP* /talked about my feelings./ I know, I know, I'm sure it sounds horrifying to you, but I'm glad I have people I can open up with on a deep, emotional level. There are some guys I've gotten to that point with as well, but most women have more experience with heart-to-hearts than guys, since they're not expected to bottle all their feelings up until they explode.

I'll admit there's no way I'll ever be able to see things your way, for a simple reason that I haven't shared with you before. It does affect the way I interact with women, and I'm sure you'll see it as a point in your favor - the exception that proves the rule, as it were. And I'm sure the anons will jump on this too

I'm asexual. I have a full libido, and lots of kinks (obviously, I wouldn't be here otherwise), but I look at a woman (or a girl, for that matter), and feel no sexual attraction. Same thing if I look at a guy or a non-binary person. It makes treating women like they're people and not just walking sex-objects much easier.

But I'm not gonna end on that sappy shit

>because of my job specific I get access to private conversations of people online sometimes

The fuck do you work for, the CIA? (or government specific alternative?) Or maybe you're one of the last Twitter moderators that Elon just forgot to fire, lol