>>18137
Like you yourself said, the posts are old. Legislation and/or site rules may have changed in that time. And maybe, since you're so very busy, you don't spend your time rereading and scrutinizing old posts to make sure they comply with new rules.

>>18136
and you, you couldn't bother to check the timestamps to see that the redundant reports were posted three seconds apart? You're clearly aware that things move fast here.